Kommentare zu: Bevorstehendes Ereignis: Nordkorea zündet Atombombe http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/ Pathes into the zone Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:52:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Von: RONUrike http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-683 RONUrike Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:52:36 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-683 Hallo, sehr schöne Forum !!!!!! <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">:)</a> Hallo, sehr schöne Forum !!!!!! :)

]]> Von: Andreas http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-425 Andreas Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:59:48 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-425 Webbots erwarten für Ende Oktober Ereignisse, wie du sie beschrieben hast. Webbots erwarten für Ende Oktober Ereignisse, wie du sie beschrieben hast.

]]> Von: Karsten http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-390 Karsten Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:15:07 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-390 Scroll down and read all "Forthcoming event" topics. I predicted an (atomic) explosion either in Iran or North Korea. I will add links to them in the article. The task at hand was: "Describe the event which triggers a strong decline of the DAX value (german stock indice) in 2009". The result was an object and a connected event of ‘public media interest‘. I drew a timeline and marked two points - in spring and autumn. The event seemed to occur in spring and the impact of it on the DAX would be in autumn. The session were done blind. Thats why I wrote ‘The event can but not need to be the predicted event‘, because the event itself had no significant impact on the DAX (yet). Well at least as predicted in the session. Scroll down and read all “Forthcoming event” topics. I predicted an (atomic) explosion either in Iran or North Korea. I will add links to them in the article.

The task at hand was: “Describe the event which triggers a strong decline of the DAX value (german stock indice) in 2009″. The result was an object and a connected event of ‘public media interest‘. I drew a timeline and marked two points – in spring and autumn. The event seemed to occur in spring and the impact of it on the DAX would be in autumn. The session were done blind. Thats why I wrote ‘The event can but not need to be the predicted event‘, because the event itself had no significant impact on the DAX (yet). Well at least as predicted in the session.

]]> Von: PJ http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-389 PJ Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:05:20 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-389 I'm not sure what this means? "The event can but not need to be the predicted event of public media interest." What is the predicted event/source/etc.? PJ I’m not sure what this means? “The event can but not need to be the predicted event of public media interest.” What is the predicted event/source/etc.?

PJ

]]>