Kommentare zu: Bevorstehendes Ereignis: Nordkorea zündet Atombombe http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/ Pathes into the zone Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:15:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Von: Andreas http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-425 Andreas Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:59:00 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-425 Webbots erwarten für Ende Oktober Ereignisse, wie du sie beschrieben hast. Webbots erwarten für Ende Oktober Ereignisse, wie du sie beschrieben hast.

]]> Von: Karsten http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-390 Karsten Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:15:00 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-390 Scroll down and read all "Forthcoming event" topics. I predicted an (atomic) explosion either in Iran or North Korea. I will add links to them in the article. The task at hand was: "Describe the event which triggers a strong decline of the DAX value (german stock indice) in 2009". The result was an object and a connected event of ‘public media interest‘. I drew a timeline and marked two points - in spring and autumn. The event seemed to occur in spring and the impact of it on the DAX would be in autumn. The session were done blind. Thats why I wrote ‘The event can but not need to be the predicted event‘, because the event itself had no significant impact on the DAX (yet). Well at least as predicted in the session. Scroll down and read all “Forthcoming event” topics. I predicted an (atomic) explosion either in Iran or North Korea. I will add links to them in the article.

The task at hand was: “Describe the event which triggers a strong decline of the DAX value (german stock indice) in 2009″. The result was an object and a connected event of ‘public media interest‘. I drew a timeline and marked two points – in spring and autumn. The event seemed to occur in spring and the impact of it on the DAX would be in autumn. The session were done blind. Thats why I wrote ‘The event can but not need to be the predicted event‘, because the event itself had no significant impact on the DAX (yet). Well at least as predicted in the session.

]]> Von: PJ http://www.remoteviewing.org/de/2009/north-korea-atombomb-nordkorea-atombombe/comment-page-1/#comment-389 PJ Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:05:00 +0000 http://www.remoteviewing.org/?p=465#comment-389 I'm not sure what this means? "The event can but not need to be the predicted event of public media interest." What is the predicted event/source/etc.? PJ I’m not sure what this means? “The event can but not need to be the predicted event of public media interest.” What is the predicted event/source/etc.?

PJ

]]>