Remote Sensing

Pathes into the zone

Jul
03

Germany wins FIFA World Cup 2010

Posted by Karsten

I intended to use Remote Viewing to investigate the winner of the FIFA World Cup 2010 before it began. Because of lack of time and personal sensitivities I were not able to do it earlier than the round of 16 using Associative Remote Viewing (ARV). That is a technique to replace the event with another target (ie. a photo) for better analysis.

The favorites were:

1. Group: Spain, Brazil, England, Germany, Argentina, Italy
2. Group: Netherlands, France, Portugal, Greece, Denmark, Uruguay

The selection were chosen because of bookmakers favorites. I’d like to have an equal count in groups so added Denmark. Marked in red are the countries of the first Remote Viewing session result. It was crisp, clear and easy to analyse.

The next session were ignored because of me being too tired and a bad technical result.

At the time of the third session England and Italy were out. The new groups under investigation were:

3. Group: Spain, Brazi
4. Group: Argentina, Germany

The result was again crisp and clear for the 4. Group (marked red).
At last I’ve chosen the following countries from the 4. Group:

Argentina – Germany

Again the result was obvious and in favor of Germany. That means the Winning Team of the Final of the FIFA World Cup 2010 will be the Winner of the quarter final game “Argentina versus Germany“. At the time I write this essay the game is already over and Germany won with four goals against Argentina. Session were done before the game.

As a cross check a new Remote Viewing session were done with the remaining members:

5. Group: Germany, Paraguay
6. Group: Uruguay, Netherlands, Argentina, Spain

For the 5. Group only Germany und Paraguay were chosen because the first seems to be the Winner of the Final. The result were also not identifiable and ignored. I have an idea why that happend but need more time to be sure. For me the ARV project of the FIFA World Cup 2010 is finished because I don’t want to degrade my skill with working on the same topic too long. Novelty is a key in Remote Viewing!

July, 03rd 2010

Edit on July 07th, 2010: Germany lost against Spain and will play in the Match for the third place and so can't be the winners of the World Cup 2010.

Jan
17

Key event

Posted by Karsten

Here is a long anecdote about the topic: ‘Find missing things through Remote Viewing
Please take the time, it’s really valuable. Beforehand: The hidden Key were found.

In September 2006 a familiy member were instructed to hide a key in my home. Anywhere. In the cupboard, on the cupboard, below the carpet – wherever. I then tried to describe the place the key is located. My first session were done frontloaded, means I know it was about the hidden key. The task reads: ‘The main feature to find the key, hidden to be found by Remote Viewing.
The viewer describes the main features from an optimal observer position and have a look on the physically configuration of the items
‘.

Actually too complex verbalized. But it was clear what I should do. The session began easy and I was able to perceive the key lies under something. But the surroundings were completely uniform and unidentifiable. Keep in mind what’s in our homes today: Little items from holidays, cables for satellite receivers etc. Anything without real use instead to collect dust. A Stage 4 (my RV method uses eight stages) on these details is very painful!

Sketch #1

(Click on left picture to enlarge)
A short explanation: The [X] marks the target, here the key. Aspect [A] and [B] is context information of the environment. The numbers in brackets ([1], [2] und [3]) should be investigated in more depth for later sessions. This representation is for sure inaccurate and many will be surprised, because they heard so much more about Remote Viewing in the past. This is a typical representation of a Remote Viewing result from an average viewer. But this should not hide the fact of its information content. It is is only for the first contact with the target shown as a diagram. The topic about how the media and internet debate remote viewing and what you can expect will be later discussed in a seperate article in the FAQ (see on top of this page).

 
 
 
 

Another session with element [1] brought the following results:

Sketch #2Sketch #3

This was the first time the percept ‘Candle‘ appeared, beside several others like ‘vase‘ and ‘glass bottle‘. The object or feature seemed to be round and vertical. A birds eye view (see on the right) showed the round attribute in an angular basic form. To be truth, if you see something like that you will say: ‘What a bullshit!‘. The sketch doesn’t helped to find the object in my home. Being helpless, I sketched the layout of my home and tried to find the room through my intution in which the key locates.

This pen tour ended in the living room. At last I drew Sketch #4 of an egg shaped object. After the session ends I searched for everything looking like a glass vase or bottle which can be seen on Sketch #2. But it was useless.

Sketch #4Sketch #5

On the left you can see Sketch #4.

After this disaster I used a new task added to my target pool: ‘Most recognizable feature of the hidden key’s present location.‘. At the work I didn’t knew the task was about the key. Such a session is called blind. Maybe not the smartest task. The result can be seen on the right in Sketch #5. It looks like something water splashy. I thought about the water faucets in my apartment. But there are too many similarly possibilites. Useless to find the key through that task.

Sketch #6

One year later with the task: ‘Current location of the hidden key‘, done blind from my target pool, gave me the Sketch on the left. Now again something angular with something round on it.

The blind done sessions were all very hard to understand. I was demotivated and tried a new session, done frontloaded, knowing it was about the key. After 45 minutes describing unidentifiable elements I tried the following movement in Stage 6: ‘180° from Element [1], looking into the room, something should be visible‘.
Element [1] was the aspect I suspected the key were covert. I sketched a room with a table and something like a “mirror” and the idea of my living room. Finished the session and going into the living room I saw the corner were Element [1] must reside. It was the same corner from Sketch #3. There were nothing else than a wall mount for a candle. Searched everything but nothing. Lifted the Candle: Nothing. Seems Remote Viewing is not easy to use to locate objects.

Two years later sitting in my living room thinking again about the hidden key. I stand up and searched again. Everything in the corner of the living room. To make it complete I had another look under the candle of the wall mount and there he was, the hidden Key. There can only be one solution: Someone else have moved the key within all the timeframe from the first sessions to two years later. I was angry. That was not part of the experiment. Leaving for a moment to get my camera at hand, looking again under the candle: No Key!! Very strange. I was the only one in the apartment. What’s up?? Where is the key?? In the moment I put down the candle on the wall mount I see something glued under the candle: The key! He must be there since the beginning of the experiment but I never saw him because of the the sticky wax.

Sketch #7180_gedreht

Some photos for illustration:
On the left you can see the sketch with the table and “mirror”, on the right the real living room table and the cabinet with pane. The photo was done exactly 180° rotated from the key’s location.

 
 
 
 
 

All photos were done two years afterwards in 2009.

 
 

KerzenhalterKey

Here you can see the candle on the wall mount. Something round on an angular object. On the right photo the key is sticked under the candle. The egg shaped structure of the candle can be seen in Sketch #4 including the wick! During the session it looked more like a computer mouse. But this is typical for a Remote Viewing session: The viewer never knows what he describes. The order is describe, not identify.

Ten session were done altogehter and most were not helpful. Skeptics may rightly argument only frontloaded session were useful. Who knows how humans communicate unconsciously and which signals were transfered between the family member and myself througout one year. But the key was never mentioned in that time period. Also this Blog is here to give you insights into my experiences and should not be seen for correct scientific experiments.

January 17th, 2010

Jan
16

Still here and active

Posted by Karsten

Dear readers,

I’m still here and active. Last months I was heavily involved into one of my own Remote Viewing projects. Nothing newsworthy because it isn’t finished yet. Stay tuned, more news about remote viewing results are coming.

It isn’t the problem of doing sessions: On average I view one each week. But firstly I need to translate everything into english and secondly many Remote Viewing sessions are private and it isn’t easy to describe the experience of my real life in all glory detail to make the results comprehensible for my readers.

January 16th, 2010

Aug
24

Barack Obama

Posted by Karsten

Remote Viewing Session were done blind by me with Interviewer. Task: ‘Describe Barack Obama’s term in office as a historical view from the year 2020‘.

Data showed a person in the session which ‘was overambitious without respect for others, especially for his family‘. He now (in 2020) has stronger family relations, ‘three children‘. It was a ‘job-related success‘ and is now ‘self-employed‘. There seemed to be a ‘strong problem with financial strategies‘, ‘a big loss‘ and he ‘shouldn’t listen to others‘. The biggest failure were ‘problems with women/liasion‘. But the person is contented in 2020 and haven’t regrets about anything. I got the impression the data seemed to be very subjective, because the person is not much more different as in the moment.

I marked four important events from now to the year 2020 in the life of that person (in chronological order).

1. The first one (third largest) showed a ‘childbirth‘, which ‘will soon occur‘. A happy event for anyone. Analysis: Obama will become a father, because as written above, the person in 2020 seems to have three children.

2. The second (least) were a combination of several small events. They contains problems with healthiness, a risk and isn’t easy to get well. The person is worried about it. In the session I got the impression the person itself would be sick. But now, in the analysis, I’m not sure if the topic is the current pandemic influenza (swine flu) seen from a political viewpoint. So it will induce great worries, even if the outcome is unproblematic. But that’s not known yet (every president should have it’s own RVer, isn’t it?).

3. The third (largest) important event in the term of office of Barack Obama is ‘something job-related‘. He is the center of it and it ‘strengthen his personality‘. ‘Beautiful women are around him‘, ‘like a secretary‘. Analysis: The reelection of Obama in 2012.

4. The fourth one (second largest) is a sad event ‘connected with his family‘. It is ‘not job-related‘. ‘Feeling devastated‘. ‘Lost something and is guilty‘. ‘Loyalty failed‘. ‘Like losing his girlfriend because of escapade‘. ‘Recover from it at work‘. My comment was: “There are several beautiful women there, so no problem to recover”. ;-) Analysis: Will he have a problem in his marriage? A new Bill Clinton affair? But that seems to be temporal because as I wrote above, in 2020 he will have a stronger relationship with his family.

August 24th, 2009

Jul
21

Airfrance Flight AF447

Posted by Karsten

Windows

An interviewed remote viewing session with the Task: ‘Currently missing airfrance airplane using flight AF 447 / crash cause‘ were done on July 11th, 2009. Viewer was Thorsten.

He began to describe an ‘electronic control system‘, two or three people operating and ‘moving switches‘. It seemed to be an evironment ‘like a boat bridge‘, having ‘windows‘, people ‘observing‘ and ‘operating‘. A combination of ‘people plus technic‘, controlled ‘manually‘.

A target movement five minutes into the future revealed ‘dead things laying around‘ in a wet environment. It looked ‘devastated‘.

Disaster




The main crash cause came ‘from outside‘, ‘is natural‘ and was ‘too suddenly to react upon it‘. A movement in a sketch showed an object colliding into something wet, like a wall (it is unclear if the viewer describes the impact on the sea or some event in the air).

The last question how that event could be avoided were answered: ‘Withdraw people from event location‘ and ‘People were aware it could happen but disavowed the possibility‘. It all had the feeling of a ‘natural disaster‘.


The full session can be downloaded here:
Airfrance AF447 session by Thorsten (PDF)


July 21st, 2009

May
25

Forthcoming event: North Korea explodes atombomb

Posted by Karsten

Today, Monday 25th of May 2009, North Korea explodes a second underground atombomb, officials says.
See Los Angeles Times.

The website of the U.S. Geological Survey reports a seismic event of 4.7 magnitude in North Korea at 0:54 UTC. “Comparisons of the seismograms of both atom tests shows similar features, suggesting that the two events are in close spatial proximity and are the same type of source, although the more recent event is larger.”
See USGS: Magnitude 4.7 – North Korea.

The event can but not need to be the predicted event of public media interest I wrote two articles about (see below). Although it could explain the fact why it occurs in May but have first consequences in autumn end of the year.

Edit (2009-07-04): The original task at hand was: ‘Describe the event which triggers a strong decline of the DAX value (german stock indice) in 2009‘. The result was an object and a connected event of ‘public media interest‘. I drew a timeline and marked two points – in spring and autumn. The event seemed to occur in spring and the impact of it on the DAX would be in autumn. The session were done blind. Thats why I wrote ‘The event can but not need to be the predicted event‘, because the event itself had no significant impact on the DAX (yet). Well at least as predicted in the session.

Direct links to former articles:
1. Forthcoming event in Iran or North Korea?
2. Update: Forthcoming event…

May 25th, 2009

May
10

Great Cheops pyramid in Egypt

Posted by Karsten

Remote Viewing session with interviewer. Task was: ‘Target is the Cheops Pyramid in Gizeh, Egypt. Go back to the time of their construction and describe in DETAIL which technical tools were used for the structure and its purpose‘.

In the first two sketches I drew several boxes which moves sideways. The structure also moves up- and downwards, like being stuck on ropes. Impression of a boot swimming on water.
One of the boxes (Element [1]) was described as a forward roll back movement. It moves jagged sideways and up-down. Its supposably faster than a cyclist. The person on the sketches is only a reference for the size.

I perceived a person group were the people in it seemed to be strongly connected to each other. Like no one could move without the other. A team.
On Page 8 my interviewer said I should have a look if there is more on the left side of the site. I sketched an abstract scenery with two important locations. Especially the left one [O2] was prominent. I perceived it was in a foreign country – like being in Bavaria (because they have strange rites, customs and dialects. Its like being in another country if you are in Bavaria, an insider joke of germans).
On Page 10 there’s an unidentifiable structure [K1]. It seems to be an old technology, got out of style and nobody likes to own it. Additionally there was the fleating impression of a ‘dryly current flow‘ (electricity), but I didn’t understand how electricity could be dry and not moving. The Session was interrupted and continued on the next day.

Download the complete Remote Viewing sessions:
Session #1 (PDF – German)
Session #2 (PDF – German)

May 10th, 2009

Apr
25

Update: Forthcoming event…

Posted by Karsten

Sphere from outsideDots inside

A remote viewing session with interviewer by Thorsten supports the idea of an imminent unusual event of public media interest. His results showed a ‘novel, highly advanced, electronic – but not mechanical‘ object. It looks like a sphere with a cross on it (left).

Its delevopment in the future is different: Inside are now ‘blue lightdots, jumping back and forth‘ very fast (right).



Smoky


A target movement ‘1000 Meter above the site something should be visible‘ revealed something smoky in the center. ‘Difficult living conditions for people‘. Sounds appeared ‘like coming from a helicopter‘ and ‘watching, people are shocked like this has never been seen before, panic, uncoordinated‘. There’s a ‘high-pitched tone‘ which seems ‘very annoying‘ to the viewer. ‘Could crack glass‘.



Next target movement ‘Describe the significant and recognizable features of the country at present time‘. The Viewer then depict a ‘flat building, people are involved‘ and ‘object of research‘. The land was ‘totally uninhabited‘. Timeline indicated here the event could occur in autumn this year (2009).

At last he tried to sketch the country flag which was unrecognizable to date. The Viewer was uninformed about the target. The drawing of the flag was done at the intentional prompt by the Interviewer.

Country flag

April 25th, 2009

Apr
13

Forthcoming event in Iran or North Korea?

Posted by Karsten

Because of an ongoing remote viewing project I can’t tell the task I’ve used. But I have indications of an forthcoming event of public media interest.

A ‘structure‘ was shown in the session sketch which attributes contain ‘rotating movement, up and down, shaking-vibration‘. To me it was ‘too complex‘, a movement which ‘intimitated me as a human‘, is combined with a ‘building‘ and seems ‘mechanical‘. It is used to ‘create something‘ and it makes people feel ‘unhappy because of its movement‘. They are ‘unhappy, aggressive, disappointed‘ and ‘its very important to them‘.  Its a ‘taboo issue‘.

Centrifuge like structure

A target movement on an element of the structure showed a ‘bright emissive, smoky‘ and ‘energy-rich‘ event which ‘attracts attention‘. Something ‘drift apart‘ and has a ‘weird, granular surface‘. People feel now differently: On one side they feel ‘gratification, happy‘ and others ‘chaotic, concerned, unhappy‘. A ‘cuboid‘ thing with ‘transport‘ is included.

Explosion like event

A target movement into bird’s eye view showed the area to be round shaped. The energy of the event drifts apart from the center, like an earthquake and is triggered from the ground. Its like inhabited territory, but with very low houses and vehicles. ‘Like hot desert sand‘. A chain reaction is going on. I got the impression that its like a ‘training area‘. The event itself is ‘exceptional, its done oftener, its controlled, clouded in secrecy, destructive, cruel and hostile‘.

Bird's eye view of event

Where will it occur? I’ve only draw a rose of a compass so far and got the North-East course, outside of Germany. Follow on sessions could isolate the exact region. A timeline showed the event would occur last days in May 2009, but consequences of it would be in beginning of October and could influence financial markets.

Two things are in my mind as a conclusion:
- its an (underground) atomic explosion in North Korea like we saw before.
- its a local and temporary limited millitary attack on Iran, because I got ‘like hot desert sand‘ and a centrifuge like structure.

Overall it seems to be a controlled event, not an accident or a nature desaster; its of hostile quality. What I’m not sure about is if people need to act against others (like destroy something of interest) or if people create something with explosion-like character with hostile intentions and others are only angry and in awe of this. Need to be clarified. Any comments would be appreciated!

April 13th, 2009

Feb
26

Optimum job trajectory

Posted by Karsten

Remote Viewing Session on November 02nd, 2008. Task: ‘Optimum trajectory/job‘.
Like always in my last optimum trajectory sessions, the results were not fruitful. Indecipherable. Lacking the skill or being a sceptic person, who knows. Sometimes I’m too hard on myself. Well, I can say for sure it was nothing about dinosaurs and hadn’t to do with astronauts. At least thats something to consider. :D

A notice to the reader: Optimum trajectory means the way to reach a desired topic, here ‘job’. The job itself must not be shown in a session, at best in a side note.

My sketches showed tent-like objects grouped together and words like ‘missed opportunity, was set up, test of courage‘ and ‘job-related‘ popped up.

optimum trajectory for job

In a Stage 6 I drew a round thing with two significant crosses. When the session were over I got the sensation I had seen this before but couldn’t remember where. Looked to me like a radar screen, maybe in the Nintendo game ‘Pilot Wings’? Didn’t make sense to me.

Two crosses in a session

Yesterday, four months later, I took a book and went to the toilette. Sitting there, the book in my hand, looked at it and bOoM, I saw crosses on the book cover. It reminded me immediately of this session without being thinking of it since months. It feeled like an enlightment. Here is the book cover:

CRV book by Morehouse

One more piece to the great puzzle in sessions. My optimum job trajectory has something to do with: Remote Viewing! – Scary…

February 26th, 2009